by Margaret Anna Alice. Originally published on her Substack.
I know I’ve been hard on you about this, but it is because I expected better from you.
I expected you to evaluate the designed-to-fail studies with the same eye for corruption and fraud you apply to the injection studies.
I expected you to recognize that ivermectin is being targeted for smearing and censorship because it poses an existential threat to the injectable product.
How could you not realize the pharmaceutical corporations discredited ivermectin to obtain the EUAs that granted them immunity from lawsuits?
How could you not see that it was necessary for them to obliterate consideration of early treatment protocols so they could force us into their billion-dollar “solution”?
How could you not understand that we would have suffered none of the deaths and injuries caused by the injection, hospicidal protocols, lockdowns, masking, school closures, and other detrimental interventions; job losses; psychological trauma; damage to children; economic destruction; or tyrannical measures if Dr. Vladimir Zelenko’s early treatment protocol had been adopted when he introduced it in March 20201?
How could you not be suspicious of the lurking presence of Unitaid, a Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation pawn, in conjunction with efforts to suppress ivermectin?
The failure to recommend ivermectin is not a side story, as you suggested in your debate with Dr. Kory.
It is THE story, Alex. Because with ivermectin, every injection, every death, every injury, every infringement on our rights in the name of “saving” us from COVID wouldn’t have happened. Indeed, it would have made for a very boring story.
You and others challenging the narrative would not have been banned by Twitter and every other tentacle of Big Tech.
The public would never have been coerced into sacrificing our freedoms for “safety.”
I was surprised to learn you have not watched the Zoom call between Dr. Tess Lawrie and Dr. Andrew Hill. As an investigator of Unreported Truths, aren’t you curious about a video documenting the mechanisms of scientific fraud?
Will you watch it now, Alex?
This may be the single-most important twenty minutes you can spend to see how the pharmaceutical industry manipulates scientists into compromising their findings.
If people see how that happened with ivermectin, they can understand how it was done with the $cience™ on the injection, too.
Today is World Ivermectin Day. What better time to revisit your position on this matter?
If you open your mind to the evidence of ivermectin’s effectiveness, you would strengthen your credibility as a reporter.
If you open your heart to the hundreds of thousands of patients who have recovered after taking ivermectin, you would deepen your compassion as a human being.
This is your moment of opportunity, Alex. Thanks to Pierre’s gracious presentation of the compelling arguments in ivermectin’s favor, you can change your stance with dignity as a sign of your moral character and integrity.
You have a voice, Alex.
You have the power to help change the ending of the horror story still unfolding.
You could save thousands, maybe even millions, of lives.
Isn’t that a legacy worth changing your mind for?
- The very fact that The New York Times was doing a hit piece on Zelenko as early as April 2020 should have tipped you off that there was something awry. Why wouldn’t they be praising the efforts of a respected doctor to discover life-saving treatments in the midst of an emergency governments deemed important enough to shut down the world for?
© Margaret Anna Alice, LLC
Note: Purchasing any items using Amazon affiliate links included in my content will further support my efforts to unmask tyranny.